[DNSOP] Re: New I-D: draft-barrett-dnsop-domain-set-00 - T he Domain Set Discovery Protocol (seeking dispatch guidance)

It appears that Ben Schwartz  <[email protected]> said:
>I don't think this is really suitable for DNSOP.
>
>The big challenge with this category of proposals is semantic: what
>does it mean to be part of a set?  There are many different kinds of
>relationships between domains and organizations, and so two domains
>might be "the same organization" for some purposes but not others.
>DNSOP is probably not the place to establish any kind of taxonomy like
>that. ...

If we take this up at all, it'd need a small focused WG since it has
aspects of DNS and TLS and CAs and more. The DBOUND WG a decade ago
tried to address the same owner question as well as the owner boundary
problem and failed at both.

While I think the approach in this draft is technically plausible, I
would want to see evidence that there is significant interest from
people who would use it. And also that they would want to use it in a
form that says these N domains have the same owner, but no hint about
who that owner is.

R's,
John

PS: Alternative proposal, put something in RDAP.  Not asserting that's a great idea.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]