[DNSOP] Re: DELEXT: Proposed Delegation Type Ranges

Hi wg.

I like examples, so I will provide TL;DR examples:

On 21. 08. 26 14:14, Roy Arends wrote:
> After the discussions over the past few weeks, the authors of DELEG and DELEXT have converged on two additional ranges (Ranges 2 and 3) of Delegation Types, distinguished by how they affect the contents of a referral:
> 
> Range 1: NS-Omitting Delegation Types
- DELEG as currently proposed
- DELEG2 (version 2)
- DELEG3 etc.

> Range 2: NS-Preserving Delegation Types
- similar to DS today
- DS2 (version 2)
- DNSKEYINCLUDE
(i.e. stuff needed by resolver/validator when they encounter referral)

> Range 3: On-Demand Delegation Types
Wildly speculative examples:
- DBOUND
- PSL (Public Suffic List marker)
(stuff resolver is not interested in, but a end-user app might be)

> Range 4: Private Delegation Types

Now the question is, do we need three sub-ranges for privates or not? :-)

-- 
Petr Špaček

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]