[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Call for adoption: draft-huque-dnsop -multi-alg-rules-08 (Ends 2026-08-31)

Joe Abley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 24 Aug 2026, at 16:01, Philip Homburg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Initially, there is nothing special about post-quantum. Those algorithms can
> become UNIVERSAL and then be added to the mix.
> 
> What is special is the desire by some to prefer PQ algorithms. That would
> require extra work if those algorithms would also want to be considered
> UNIVERSAL.

I think it is very early to make architectural decisions about PQ algorithms and DNSSEC. To me, it makes more sense to provide transparency for operators as they try out different local validation policies and gain experience. Once we have a better handle on what makes sense we can revisit. 

This was the thinking behind the draft I mentioned a week or two ago. Perhaps this approach could help avoid complicating multi-alg-rules with too much handwaving about stuff we don't have much experience with. 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jabley-dnsop-local-signing-algorithm-policy/


Joe

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.