[DNSOP] Re: DNSOPDELEXT: Proposed Delegation Type Ranges
"John Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsop |
|---|---|
| Organization | Taughannock Networks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It appears that Roy Arends <[email protected]> said: >That gives us three useful behaviours: > >Range 1: include the Delegation Type, omit NS. >Range 2: include the Delegation Type, retain NS. >Range 3: do not include the Delegation Type in the referral; return it only when explicitly queried. How is range 3 different from any random type like TXT? Is it just saying that it's OK to have these at a referral point? R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]