[DNSOP] Re: DNSOPDELEXT: Proposed Delegation Type Ranges
"John R Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026, Roy Arends wrote:
>> How is range 3 different from any random type like TXT?
>
> Random types like TXT can't exist at a delegation point.
I see this in RFC 2181 sec 6.1:
Other than the DNSSEC cases mentioned immediately below, servers
should ignore data other than NS records, and necessary A records to
locate the servers listed in the NS records, that may happen to be
configured in a zone at a zone cut.
That sounds like don't return them, not forbid them.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]