[DNSOP] Re: DNSOPDELEXT: Proposed Delegation Type Ranges

It appears that Wes Hardaker  <[email protected]> said:
>Roy Arends <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I think there may be a misunderstanding about the purpose of these
>> ranges.
>
>As I said, I think the purpose has changed from where it started (or my
>memory is bad).  It's fine if it's changed of course, but we should then
>ask is it needed given the underlying assumptions have changed.
>
>> The question the ranges answer is simple: when constructing a
>> referral, should this Delegation Type be included, and should the NS
>> RRset also be included?

Per recent mail, there's a separate question for the type 3 records: is this
a record that is authoritative at the delegation point in the parent, even
though it is not involved in referrals.

I think that's OK but I'd like the document to be very clear that's how it works.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]