[DNSOP] Re: DNSOPDELEXT: Proposed Delegation Type Ranges

It appears that Petr Å paÄ ek <[email protected]> said:
>In other words, delext makes most of the ecosystem extensible with 
>parent types and only consumers (resolvers) of the new types will need a 
>code change in future, when a new RR type is allocated.
>
>Does it make sense now?

It does, but I am a wee bit nervous that since at the moment we only
have one of the three possible record categories, the code to process
the other two will be poorly debugged. We'll have to fix the software
again when we really have DS2 or DBOUND and the code gets exercised.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]