RE: AS2 XML requirements (was Re: HL7 Standards Process)
"Dick Brooks" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ediint |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gunther, see responses inline. > 1) AS1 vs. AS2 / email vs. HTTP > > Kepa, I agree with you. Dick and Wes, I see a good place for email routes > especially to smaller participants. However, we had been engaged > in endless > hard debates on this issue before and it's like everything had been said. > All I ask is that we will continue to offer AS1 for email and AS2 for > HTTP and whatever else we need. I didn't see you object against continuing > to offer AS1, and that is enough for me. I don't need to change your mind > to thing less negative about email. No argument here. I think it was Kepa who suggested that a provider may need HTTP when sending to a Payer and a Payer may need SMTP when sending to a provider. Both parties should be free to implement the "inbound" delivery approach that meets their security, performance, reliability and business requirements. The HL7 interoperability profile needs to specify these details. Dick Brooks Group 8760 110 12th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] 205-250-8053 Fax: 205-250-8057 http://www.8760.com/ InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions