Re: EDIINT AS2-U, AS2-G and a separate conformance document?
"Carl Hage" <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:52:02 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ediint |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3E37C062.15004.516425B6@localhost> |
From: [email protected] Date sent: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:05:12 -0500 > However, I am against the notion of AS2-U and AS2-G!! The former version > is used by many more than just the UCC and the latter version is named for > a group that no longer exists! Instead of U and G, a letter matching the style could be used in lieu the name of an organization, e.g. M and F, for MIME and Form-Data. Or choose some letter that better describes the technical difference. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Carl Hage C. Hage Associates <mailto:[email protected]> Voice/Fax: 1-408-244-8410 1180 Reed Ave #51 <http://www.chage.com/chage/> Sunnyvale, CA 94086