Fwd: MIB review guidelines ptr added to: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/wgch airs.html
Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
FYI -- New MIB review guidelines. We should make sure that anything we submit matches these guidelines before submission. Thanks, Margaret >From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: MIB review guidelines ptr added to: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/wgch > airs.html >Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 16:14:38 +0200 > >Just so all WG chairs know, the iesg-secretariat has added a ptr >to the Mib-Review-Guidelines (those used by MIB doctors to review >MIB documents when asked by IESG or ADs) to the wgchairs web >page at: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/wgchairs.html > >If you want to go to them rigth away, the current MIB-Review-Guidelines >are in document: > www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-01.txt > >If you (WG chairs) or your WG members or MIB document editors/authors >have any issues, concerns, comments on thise review guidelines, pls >holler and let us know about it ([email protected] is the best >mailing list for it, but if you send it to me I will handle). > >Whenever a MIB document comes to the IESG, the responsible AD normally asks >me (OPS NM AD) to get a MIB Doctor review done (often before we issue >an IETF Last Call). So that is where this comes into play. > >Of course, if WG chairs review MIB documents against those guidelines >themselves first (or make their WG members or doc editors/authors do so), >then that will make the approval process go faster/smoother. > >Hope this helps >Bert Wijnen >co-AD OPS (NM) Area