entity mib support for tcif
Kaj Tesink <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
i was told that this request hadnt made it to the entire intended audience,
so here goes again. sorry for the duplicate for those who did receive
the first time.
kaj
=========================================================
entity mib wg,
attached is a discussion on accommodating
some TCIF information elements in an appropriate
MIB module.
the entity mib would be a good candidate, but
we understand that the timing may be problematic
since it's going to draft right now.
we're talking about 6 data elements (see
TCIF-02-004, 09/11/2002). most can probably be mapped to existing
objects, but not all.
so it appears that we have several options:
a) extend the entity mib with the 'missing' objects (see attached strawman)
b) write a 'supplemental' mib module for the 'missing' objects
c) find another suitable mib module
while a) seems most desirable the current state of the entity mib may make
it problematic(?). (b) seems somewhat overkill.
(c) seems suboptimal.
the new objects would only be required for systems that support management
access to this information.
any comments? particulars attached,
pl copy Cc list above,
kaj, tony,
============================================================
TCIF Required MIB objects:
- CLEI Code
Suggested to use: new object
Reference: TCIF-02-004, 09/11/2002
Reference: ANSI T1.213-2001 and T1.213a-2001, T1M1.3
- Unique Serial Identification (USI)
Suggested to use: entPhysicalSerialNum
- Software Version
Suggested to use: entPhysicalSoftwareRev
- Manufacture Date
Suggested to use: new object
TCIF Optional MIB objects:
- Manufacturer Identification
Suggested to use: entPhysicalMfgName
- Manufacturer Product Identification
Suggested to use: entPhysicalModelName
=============================================================
new objects:
entPhysicalCLIECode OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE (0..10))
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The CLIE Code for the physical entity. If a CLIE Code
is unknown or non-existent, the entPhysicalCLIECode will
be set to a zero-length string instead."
::= { entPhysicalEntry xx }
REFERENCE "TCIF-02-004, Guideline for data elements
included in the Management Information Base,
Telecommunications Industry Forum (TCIF), 09/11/2002.
ANSI T1.213-2001, Coded identification of equipment entities
of the North American telecommunications system for
information exchange, ANSI.
ANSI T1.213a-2001, Supplement to T1.213-2001,
Coded identification of equipment entities of the North
American telecommunications system for information exchange,
to correct the representation of the Basic Code in
Figure B.1, ANSI."
entPhysicalMfgDate OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DateAndTime
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The manufacturing date for the physical entity."
::= { entPhysicalEntry xx }
========================================================================
>Subject: RE: Object Identifiers for MIB information
>Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:58:48 -0700
>X-MS-Has-Attach:
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>Thread-Topic: Object Identifiers for MIB information
>Thread-Index: AcNcQaap13s3mWdMQsuSf53LJiptygAEzb+Q
>From: "Faye Ly" <[email protected]>
>To: "C. M. Heard" <[email protected]>,
> "Giamboi, Anthony" <[email protected]>
>Cc: "Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <[email protected]>,
> "Lee, Shyhyann" <[email protected]>,
> "Fox, Robert H." <[email protected]>,
> "Kaj Tesink" <[email protected]>,
> "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
>X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.2(snapshot 20021217) (thumper)
>
>It sounds like ENTITY-MIB is only missing the Manufacture date and
>CLEI? Why don't we bring them up to the ENTITY-MIB WG?
>
>-faye
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: C. M. Heard [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:39 AM
>To: Giamboi, Anthony
>Cc: Faye Ly; 'Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)'; Lee, Shyhyann; Fox, Robert H.; 'Kaj
>Tesink'; 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'
>Subject: RE: Object Identifiers for MIB information
>
>On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Giamboi, Anthony wrote:
> > I asked the initial question.
> >
> > The issue is:
> >
> > The Telecommunications Industry Forum (TCIF) has issued a document
> > (TCIF.02.004 Guideline for Data Elements Included in the Management
> > Information Base (MIB)). This document states that there are 4 data
> > elements that must be included in a MIB and they are:
> >
> > CLEI code
> > Unique Serial Number
> > Software version that is running
> > Date of Manufacture
> >
> > In order for a manufacturer to load this information in the MIB we
> > wanted to know if there was a standard way to identify these data
> > elements within the MIB. If there is, great, if there isn't, maybe
> > there should be? We are looking for your guidance on this issue.
>
>As of today, a vendor can represent these items either by proprietary
>MIB objects or by a combination of standard objects in the ENTITY-MIB
>and some proprietary objects. The details will be vendor- and
>equipment-specific.
>
>If the TCIF is happy with that -- i.e., if their requirement is just to
>have the information represented in some way, not necessarily the same
>way for each vendor/device -- then there is no need to worry about
>standardizing another MIB module. If they want a vendor- and
>device-independent way of getting this information, then more work is
>needed.
>
>For what it's worth, here's the stuff that the ENTITY-MIB already has:
>
>entPhysicalHardwareRev
>entPhysicalFirmwareRev
>entPhysicalSoftwareRev
>entPhysicalSerialNum
>entPhysicalMfgName
>entPhysicalModelName
>
>As noted previously, entPhysicalModelName could be used for CLEI code,
>but other things could appear there. As far as I know, there is no
>object for Date of Manufacture, that would have to be in a proprietary
>MIB extension.
>
>I hope this helps more than it confuses :-)
>
>Mike
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Kaj Tesink
Telcordia Technologies. Inc.
331 Newman Springs Road
Red Bank, NJ 07701
Email: [email protected]
Tel: (732) 758-5254
Fax: (732) 758-4177
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Kaj Tesink
Telcordia Technologies. Inc.
331 Newman Springs Road
Red Bank, NJ 07701
Email: [email protected]
Tel: (732) 758-5254
Fax: (732) 758-4177
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/