RE: FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational State Disabled - correct ive action required?
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F038A9B42@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
Sharon, You are correct about the section number. The text I was commenting on is in Section 2.2.1 2.2.1 Admin State Locked, Operational State Disabled and Usage State Idle The entity is totally inoperable, it is not servicing any entities and it is also administratively prohibited from use. To make it available for use, both management permission and some corrective action are necessary. This is similar to an ifAdminStatus of down and ifOperStatus of down. I still believe that there is no need for a corrective action in all cases. In some cases restoring management permission by setting the admin state to unlock should be enough. The suggested text: The entity is totally inoperable, it is not servicing any entities and it is also administratively prohibited from use. To make it available for use, management permission (and in some cases corrective action) are necessary. This is similar to an ifAdminStatus of down and ifOperStatus of down. Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On > Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm > Sent: 21 November, 2003 8:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational > State Disabled - correct ive action required? > > > Hi > > Proposed Resolution to ent-state-77: > > Actually, I believe what you are describing is in section 2.2.2. > > I propose that no change is required as a result of this comment. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: entity-state [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:24 AM > To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] > Subject: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational State Disabled > - corrective > action required? > > <clip> > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [[email protected]] > > "Section 2.2.1 in [in version 01]- A corrective action is not > necessary > in all cases to make an entity available for use. In some > cases setting > the admin state to unlock should be enough." > > _______________________________________________ > Entmib mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib >