Re: Confirmming Meeting Consensus
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:24:11AM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > During the meeting in Minneapolis, there was agreement > in the room on a few points, an dI'd like to confirm > that consensus on the mailing list. > > In particular, we reached agreement at the meeting on > the following points: > > - We will deprecate the Alias Mapping Table so that the Entity > MIB can advance to Draft Standard. Well, this is what it takes... > - Future extensions to the Entity MIB should be handled as > separate MIBs that augment the Entity MIB. Not sure how useful such a blanket statement is. > - The Entity State MIB is currently too complex and should be > simplified. I like to know what precisely people find too complex before subscribing to such a blanket statement. Can someone please explain (and perhaps suggest what precisely needs to be removed)? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany