Re: Confirmming Meeting Consensus

Keith McCloghrie <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> >  - We will deprecate the Alias Mapping Table so that the Entity
> >    MIB can advance to Draft Standard.
> 
> Well, this is what it takes...
   
It would be better to deprecate only the entity2Compliance statement,
and leave the objects and group with "current" status.  Specifically,
create a new entity3Compliance which is the same as entity2Compliance
except for having the "GROUP entityMappingGroup" removed.  This would
make implementation of the Alias Mapping Table the equivalent of a
"MAY".  There are many other RFCs which are at DRAFT STANDARD Status
which contain MAYs.  I find it very difficult to believe that a check
was made that all of their MAYs were implemented before they were
permitted to become DRAFT.  For example, to take a recent example,
"MAY" appears more than 80 times in RFC 3550; was it checked that
every one of those 80 has been implemented ??

Keith.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.