Re: Confirmming Meeting Consensus
Keith McCloghrie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > - We will deprecate the Alias Mapping Table so that the Entity > > MIB can advance to Draft Standard. > > Well, this is what it takes... It would be better to deprecate only the entity2Compliance statement, and leave the objects and group with "current" status. Specifically, create a new entity3Compliance which is the same as entity2Compliance except for having the "GROUP entityMappingGroup" removed. This would make implementation of the Alias Mapping Table the equivalent of a "MAY". There are many other RFCs which are at DRAFT STANDARD Status which contain MAYs. I find it very difficult to believe that a check was made that all of their MAYs were implemented before they were permitted to become DRAFT. For example, to take a recent example, "MAY" appears more than 80 times in RFC 3550; was it checked that every one of those 80 has been implemented ?? Keith.