Re: Confirmming Meeting Consensus
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:36:29PM -0800, Keith McCloghrie wrote: > > > - We will deprecate the Alias Mapping Table so that the Entity > > > MIB can advance to Draft Standard. > > > > Well, this is what it takes... > > It would be better to deprecate only the entity2Compliance statement, > and leave the objects and group with "current" status. Specifically, > create a new entity3Compliance which is the same as entity2Compliance > except for having the "GROUP entityMappingGroup" removed. This would > make implementation of the Alias Mapping Table the equivalent of a > "MAY". Interesting proposal. Anyway, how many implementation reports did we get for these objects? None or just one and we need two? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany