Re: A state model....
Keith McCloghrie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > a) The document does not specify why the IF state model > > should be replaced (or augmented) with another model. > > IF state model does not provide the flexibility in defining the states. > When ifOperStatus is down, we do not why it is down. For example > in IPv6, the DAD may fail, there is no way to specify this in the state > info. On the contrary, the IF state model provides plenty of flexibility. Each different type of media has its own failure conditions which are specified in media-specific extensions. So, if you want to define IPv6-specific failures, then you need to define an IPv6-specific extension. Keith.