RE: Entity State MIB Next Steps

Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Sharon,

>My vote is for 1), except if the current update resolves issues from the
>previous working group last call do we need a second? There was substantial
>rewrite, but no objects were changed. I could go either way.

I realize that the objects haven't change, but enough of the text has
changed that I would like to have another WG Last Call before sending
it to the IESG, just to make sure that the new text has been well-reviewed.

>I'm hoping that the more concise text in the latest version appeases the
>concern that what the working group has come up with is too complicated.

I just finished reading the new version, and I think that it is
much simpler and clearer.  Thanks!  I would be happy to see us publish
the Entity State MIB in its current form.  What do others think?

Margaret
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.