Re: Entity State MIB Next Steps
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00cd01c3d8b9$e0c71a40$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Subrahmanya Hegde" <[email protected]> > To: "Margaret Wasserman" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 7:48 AM > Subject: Re: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Next Steps ... > Instead of having these OID definitions: > > -- Notifications > > entStateTraps OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 2 } > entStateTrapPrefix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entStateTraps 0 } > > > We can have > entStateNotifs OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 0 } > > and use 'entStateNotifs' in the corresponding NOTIFICATION-TYPE > > Reason we would like to avoid name 'Traps' is: Latest RFCs refer them > as Notifications ... This would also bring it into better alignment with the MIB review guidelines. Randy