Re: Entity State MIB Next Steps

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <00cd01c3d8b9$e0c71a40$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Hi -

> From: "Subrahmanya Hegde" <[email protected]>
> To: "Margaret Wasserman" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 7:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Next Steps
...
> Instead of having these OID definitions:
>
> -- Notifications
>
>    entStateTraps      OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 2 }
>    entStateTrapPrefix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entStateTraps 0 }
>
>
> We can have
>  entStateNotifs OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 0 }
>
> and use 'entStateNotifs' in the corresponding NOTIFICATION-TYPE
>
> Reason we would like to avoid name 'Traps' is: Latest RFCs refer them
> as Notifications
...

This would also bring it into better alignment with the MIB review
guidelines.

Randy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.