FW: [psg.com #307] AutoReply: 'notSupported' is semantically wron g
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:50:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-307. The issue will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. Replace the enumeration 'notSupported' with 'notReportable' in each of the TCs and any references within the text. For each of the (TC, object definition) pairs, move the following sort of text from the object definition to the textual convention: "A value of 'notApplicable' means that this resource is unable to report [this] state." Sharon -----Original Message----- From: entity-state [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:50 AM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Subject: [psg.com #307] AutoReply: 'notSupported' is semantically wrong <clip> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keith McCloghrie [[email protected]] " > 'notSupported' is semantically wrong, because a compliant implementation > obviously supports the MIB, but it can return 'notSupported' for > every object in the MIB. Presumably, the intended semantics is that > the agent would return the right value if only it knew the right value; > i.e., 'unknown' is the desired semantics. Also, why is each definition > of 'notSupported' defined in an object's DESCRIPTION, not in the TC's > DESCRIPTION ?"