FW: [psg.com #307] AutoReply: 'notSupported' is semantically wron g

"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:50:46 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-307. The issue will be
considered closed pending the proposed edit being done.

Replace the enumeration 'notSupported' with 'notReportable' in each of the
TCs and any references within the text.

For each of the (TC, object definition) pairs, move the following sort of
text from the object definition to the textual convention:

"A value 
of 'notApplicable' means that this resource is unable to report [this] 
state." 

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: entity-state [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:50 AM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
Subject: [psg.com #307] AutoReply: 'notSupported' is semantically wrong

<clip>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith McCloghrie [[email protected]]

"
>   'notSupported' is semantically wrong, because a compliant
implementation
>   obviously supports the MIB, but it can return 'notSupported' for
>   every object in the MIB.  Presumably, the intended semantics is that
>   the agent would return the right value if only it knew the right
value;
>   i.e., 'unknown' is the desired semantics.  Also, why is each
definition
>   of 'notSupported' defined in an object's DESCRIPTION, not in the
TC's
>   DESCRIPTION ?"