RE: FW: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ?
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:36:25 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-311. The issue will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. Replace 'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DateAndTime MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object is the date and time when state/status of the entity last changed, or zero."' With 'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DateAndTime MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object is the date and time when state/status of the entity last changed. If there has been no change since the last re-initialization of the local system, this object contains the date and time of local system initialization."' Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Subrahmanya Hegde [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:34 PM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ? Sounds great Subra Sharon Chisholm wrote: Hi The term "during" by its nature implies a span of time, rather than single value. If we replaced "that" with "local system" would that work for you? Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Subrahmanya Hegde [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:53 PM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ? 'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DateAndTime MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object is the date and time when state/status of the entity last changed. If there has been no change since the last re-initialization of the local system, this object contains the date and time of that initialization."' may be good to rephrase it as : contains the date and time during initialization 'that' does not seem to fit well Subra Sharon Chisholm wrote: The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-311. The issue will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. Replace 'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DateAndTime MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object is the date and time when state/status of the entity last changed, or zero."' With 'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DateAndTime MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object is the date and time when state/status of the entity last changed. If there has been no change since the last re-initialization of the local system, this object contains the date and time of that initialization."' Sharon -----Original Message----- From: entity-state [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:00 AM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Subject: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ? <clip> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Keith McCloghrie [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] should the MIB define DateAndTimeOrZero ? What does zero mean ? _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib> _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>