FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach and entPhysical Containedin

The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-328. The issue 
will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done.

In the various object definitions replace phrases like

"as defined by a value of
               entPhysicalContainedIn that references this entity"

With one like

"as defined by the entPhysicalContainedIn object."

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:56 PM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
Subject: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach and
entPhysicalContainedin
<clip>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Juergen Schoenwaelder [[email protected]]

"5) Several description clauses refer to "entities within its
   containment hierarchy" followed by a sentence which limits this to
   the entities "having a value of entPhysicalContainedIn that refers
   to this entity". This somehow excludes transitive containment. Is
   this by intention or accident? I mean, if I have C contained in B
   contained in A, then A still provides indirect service to C."