RE: FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage State Scope

Hi

I think it is important to distinguish between standardizing on the
behaviour and characteristics of physical entities and how this information
is reported. I think when you look at different real-world products you
can't really generalize by physical class type, only by the features that
are supported. Some of the fans and power supplies I've heard about are very
sophisticated. I'm not saying that all fans and power supplies should be,
but I don't want to put anything in the MIB that would prevent these
entities from taking advantage of the reporting capabilities within the MIB.

Sharon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:48 AM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage State Scope
<clip>

In short: I think the interpretation of the states for the various entity
classes needs to be clarified. (I think Dave also wrote something in that
direction.) Without guidance from the spec, implementations will just not
use the same model and fail to interoperate.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib