RE: FW: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ?

"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:59:03 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-311. The issue 
will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done.

Replace

'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DateAndTime
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION 
   "The value of this object is the date and
   time when state/status of the entity
   last changed, or zero."'

With

'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DateAndTime
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION 
   "The value of this object is the date and
   time when the value of any of  
   entStateAdmin, entStateOper, entStateUsage, 
   entStateAlarm, or entStateStandby changed for
   this entity.

   If there has been no change since
   the last re-initialization of the local system, 
   this object contains the date and time of 
   local system initialization. If there has been 
   no change since the entity was added to the 
   local system, this object contains the date and
   time of the insertion."'

Sharon        

-----Original Message-----
From: David T. Perkins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 1:48 AM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ?


HI,

On this object, the description needs a little more detail. Maybe it's
obvious, but the description should be clear that the value is updated
whenever the value of any of the objects entStateAdmin, entStateOper,
entStateUsage, entStateAlarm, or entStateStandby change in the row. Also,
the description needs to describe the value after hot insert or hot removal.

At 04:36 PM 2/11/2004 -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-311. The issue
>will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done.
>
>Replace
>
>'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
>SYNTAX DateAndTime
>MAX-ACCESS read-only
>STATUS current
>DESCRIPTION 
>   "The value of this object is the date and
>   time when state/status of the entity
>   last changed, or zero."'
>
>With
>
>'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
>SYNTAX DateAndTime
>MAX-ACCESS read-only
>STATUS current
>DESCRIPTION 
>   "The value of this object is the date and
>   time when state/status of the entity
>   last changed. If there has been no change since
>   the last re-initialization of the local system, 
>   this object contains the date and time of 
>   local system initialization."'
>
>Sharon        
>
> 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Subrahmanya Hegde [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:34 PM
>To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ?
>
>
>Sounds great
>
>Subra
>
>
>Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>
>
>Hi
>
>
>
>The term "during" by its nature implies a span of time, rather than 
>single
>
>value. If we replaced "that" with "local system" would that work for 
>you?
>
>
>
>Sharon
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From: Subrahmanya Hegde [mailto:[email protected] 
><mailto:[email protected]> ]
>
>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:53 PM
>
>To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
>
>Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ?
>
>
>
>
>
>'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
>
>  SYNTAX DateAndTime
>
>  MAX-ACCESS read-only
>
>  STATUS current
>
>  DESCRIPTION
>
>    "The value of this object is the date and
>
>    time when state/status of the entity
>
>    last changed. If there has been no change since
>
>    the last re-initialization of the local system,
>
>
>
>    this object contains the date and time of
>
>    that initialization."'
>
>
>
>  
>
>may be good to rephrase it as :
>
>      
>
>   contains the date and time during initialization
>
>
>
>'that' does not seem to fit well
>
>
>
>Subra
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>
>
>
>  
>
>The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-311. The issue
>
>will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done.
>
>
>
>Replace
>
>
>
>'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
>
> SYNTAX DateAndTime
>
> MAX-ACCESS read-only
>
> STATUS current
>
> DESCRIPTION
>
>   "The value of this object is the date and
>
>   time when state/status of the entity
>
>   last changed, or zero."'
>
>
>
>With
>
>
>
>'entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
>
> SYNTAX DateAndTime
>
> MAX-ACCESS read-only
>
> STATUS current
>
> DESCRIPTION
>
>   "The value of this object is the date and
>
>   time when state/status of the entity
>
>   last changed. If there has been no change since
>
>   the last re-initialization of the local system,
>
>   this object contains the date and time of
>
>   that initialization."'
>
>
>
>Sharon        
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From: entity-state [mailto:[email protected]
><mailto:[email protected]> ]
>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:00 AM
>
>To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
>
>Subject: [psg.com #311] AutoReply: DateAndTimeOrZero ?
>
>
>
><clip>
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>--
>
>Keith McCloghrie [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ]
>
>
>
>should the MIB define DateAndTimeOrZero ?  What does zero mean ?

/david t. perkins