FW: [psg.com #333] AutoReply: Relationship with Alarm MIB

"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:57:58 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-333. The issue 
will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done.

In section 3.2 add the following text:

"Alternatively, if the alarmActiveTable is queried first and an active alarm
with a value of alarmActiveResourceId that match this entPhysicalIndex is
found, then entStateAlarm can be used to quickly determine if there are
additional active alarms against this physical entity."

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:17 PM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
Subject: [psg.com #333] AutoReply: Relationship with Alarm MIB
<clip>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
David T. Perkins [[email protected]]

"The entity state MIB document should have proceeded the Alarm MIB 
document. Thus, section 3.2 is backwards."