FW: [psg.com #333] AutoReply: Relationship with Alarm MIB
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:57:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-333. The issue will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. In section 3.2 add the following text: "Alternatively, if the alarmActiveTable is queried first and an active alarm with a value of alarmActiveResourceId that match this entPhysicalIndex is found, then entStateAlarm can be used to quickly determine if there are additional active alarms against this physical entity." Sharon -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:17 PM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Subject: [psg.com #333] AutoReply: Relationship with Alarm MIB <clip> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- David T. Perkins [[email protected]] "The entity state MIB document should have proceeded the Alarm MIB document. Thus, section 3.2 is backwards."