RE: FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach an d entPhysical Containedin
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:36:50 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-328. The issue will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. In section 2.1, replace "Physical entities exist within a containment hierarchy. This raises" With "Physical entities exist within a containment hierarchy. Physical containment is defined by the entPhysicalContainedIn object[RFC2737]. This raises" And remove all explanations of what a physical hierarchy is from within the DESCRIPTION clauses. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 4:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach an d entPhysical Containedin Hi Ok. I'll add a section that defines containment hierarchy and be done with it. Or perhaps there is something in the Entity MIB I can point at. While a containment hierarchy is transitive, I think when we are talking about the states it can't really be for two reasons - Usage definitely can't be transitive - I think transitive starts getting into computed states, which we have defined out of scope. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:35 AM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach and entPhysical Containedin On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 01:44:44PM -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote: > The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-328. The issue > will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. > > In the various object definitions replace phrases like > > "as defined by a value of > entPhysicalContainedIn that references this entity" > > With one like > > "as defined by the entPhysicalContainedIn object." So this is not generally transitive? I like Dave Perkin's suggestion on this issue. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib