Re: #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)

HI,

Tell me again why a prefix of "EntityPhys" doesn't work?

At 11:03 AM 3/25/2004 -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>hi
>
>Ok, so what would be the proper prefix? I think we have ruled out 'Entity'
>and 'ITU'. 
>
>There have been some suggestions about creating a new MIB module to house
>the TCs. I've personally seen a lot of interest in using the TCs, so I think
>it would be worth the effort. Of course if we deviate too far away from the
>well-deployed OSI model, there may be less demand, but it is probably still
>worth doing.
>
>Sharon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 10:34 AM
>To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Entmib] Entity comments
>
>
>In hindsight (after having seen discussion over the last 2 days) and based
>on:
><clip>
>> 
>It seems that a ITU is NOT the proper prefix.
>But some prefix does make sense.
>
>Bert
Regards,
/david t. perkins