Entity State MIB Status
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:48:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi <co-editor hat> Ok, there were no objections to the proposed resolutions to the following issues by the Friday date that Margaret had set, so I've moved these ones to resolved: 306, 327 I think for most of the issues we are pretty close to rough consensus except for those that are related to issue #355 "OSI State to Something New Spectrum". I think we are in limbo until we agree on this and I think this issue is the source of most frustration currently within the working group. This relates to issues 308, 309, 312, 326, 330(editorial only I think) and 332. There were a few issues where people restated their original opinions rather than objecting to the proposed resolution. While I interpret this as objecting to the proposed resolution, I may need to come back and ask some annoying clarifying questions, so I would appreciate it if people could respond to those. </co-editor hat> Thanks Sharon Chisholm Portfolio Integration Nortel Networks Ottawa, Canada