RE: Publication Request: Entity MIB to Draft Standard
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:49:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504D06040@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Inline, sorry for (very) late follow up. > -----Original Message----- > From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: woensdag 5 mei 2004 15:13 > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > Subject: RE: Publication Request: Entity MIB to Draft Standard > > > > Hi Bert, > > At 12:06 PM +0200 5/5/04, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > >Follow up. > >The report itself looks nice. It speaks about rev 3 of the new > >doc, while we will do IETF Last Call for rev 4. I assume that > >the report applies equally well, and if so, then it is probably > >best to update the text of the report to also refrence rev 4. > > Yes, rev 4 just deprecates some objects. It is quite easy for me to > change the text to reference rev 4 and I will do so. > The text on IETF web page still talks about revision 3. > >The report links to 2 other html files which in turn link to > >another 10 or so other files. Not sure how well the secretariat will > >handle that. Is it too much work to merge it all into one file.. > >i.e. have the summary at the top and the details further down. > > This will be somewhat trickier. I already sent the pointer to the > secretariat, so I wonder what they'll do with it... Unless the > secretariat manages to do something useful first, I'll try to come up > with a merged version this weekend. > The version on the IETF web page still has ptrs to many files on psg.com. I actually do not know if this is considered a problem or not. Still would be nice to get it fixed. Bert > Margaret >