Re: draft-ietf-entmib-sensor-mib-02.txt

Hi Bob,

The sensor MIB has already been approved by the IESG for publication
as a Proposed Standard RFC.  So, it is too late in the process to
make editorial or non-critical changes to the document.  I have looked
through your proposed changes, and they appear to be editorial in
nature.

If you believe that the issues that you have raised represent serious
technical problems that would make it difficult to implement this MIB
and/or use it for its primary purpose, please explain further.

Thanks,
Margaret


At 09:15 PM 10/4/02, Bob Burget wrote:
>Dear IETF Working Group;
>
>I have recently become aware that a new MIB for physical sensors,
>(as defined by an entPhysicalClass value of 'sensor(8)') has been
>proposed for the IETF standards track.
>
>I request that the MIB text be modified to include some indication
>in the object descriptors that this MIB is for Physical entities.
>I hope to ensure that the relationship between the proposed MIB
>and the entPhysicalTable in the ENTITY-MIB is clarified.
>A similar case for reference is the existing entPhysicalContainsTable
>which also has the entPhysicalIndex as its INDEX.
>
>Attached is a text file that shows how this can be done.
>Please let me know if there would be any problems with this.
>
>    Thanks,
>
>--
>    Bob Burget, [email protected]