Re: CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMapping deprecation
Kaj Tesink <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:31:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
i've attached an update of the entity supplemental miblet.
the updates concern:
- change of the title
- inclusion of Juergen's suggested URN text & object
- reference to a to be published rfc for CLEI URN namespace
further actions:
- as per the emerging consensus, it is better to
insert the two objects in the entPhysicalEntry
of the entity mib itself; in that case all that is needed
is to cut&paste from the attached
- we'll post the draft for the for CLEI URN namespace request soon
- any other comments?
kaj
At 09:53 AM 8/16/2004 -0700, David T. Perkins wrote:
>HI,
>
>The below sounds like a good suggestion to me.
>
>At 10:20 AM 8/16/2004 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:41:02PM -0400, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >
> >> During the Entity MIB meeting at IETF 60 in San Diego, there was
> >> consensus in the room for the following course of action:
> >>
> >> (1) Pull the Entity State MIB document out of IESG processing
> >> (currently submitted for publication as a Draft Standard)
> >>
> >> (2) Update the document to undo the deprecation of the
> >> entAliasMapping identifier, and
> >>
> >> (3) Re-submit the Entity MIB to the IESG for publication as a
> >> Proposed Standard.
> >>
> >> We now need to confirm this consensus on the mailing list. Are there
> >> any objections to taking this course of action? Other comments?
> >
> >Sounds like a good plan to me. But if we recycle at Proposed, why do
> >we then not simply put the entSupplPhysicalManufacturingDate and the
> >entSupplPhysicalManufacturerInfo objects into the entPhysicalEntry
> >where they actually belong? A new compliance statement would deal
> >with these additions so existing implementations that comply to
> >entity2Compliance would not be affected.
> >
> >/js
>Regards,
>/david t. perkins
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Entmib mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
REACH INFO HAS CHANGED; NEW INFO PER 7/19/04:
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Kaj Tesink
Telcordia Technologies. Inc.
1 Telcordia Drive
Piscataway, NJ 08854-3923
Email: [email protected]
Tel: (732) 699-6068
Fax: (732) 336-2336
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
entitysuppl.rfc
(text/plain, 18.8 KB)
INTERNET DRAFT Kaj Tesink
Telcordia Technologies
August 16, 2004
Definitions of Entity Manufacturing and URN Managed Objects
<draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt>
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base
(MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP based
internets. In particular, it describes additional objects that
supplement those defined in the Definitions of Managed Objects for
the Entity MIB document [RFCzzzz].
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 1]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
Table of Contents
1 Conventions ............................................... 3
2 The Internet-Standard Management Framework ................ 3
3 Overview .................................................. 3
3.1 entSupplPhysicalManufacturingDate ....................... 3
3.2 entSupplPhysicalUris .................................... 3
4 Object Definitions ........................................ 5
5 Intellectual Property ..................................... 9
6 Acknowledgments ........................................... 9
7 Security Considerations ................................... 10
8 References ................................................ 11
8.1 Normative References .................................... 11
8.2 Informative References .................................. 11
9 Author's Address .......................................... 11
Full Copyright Statement ................................... 11
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 2]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
1. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL", when they appear in this document, are to be interpreted
as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
[RFC2580].
3. Overview
The objects defined in this memo are used in conjunction with objects
defined in the Entity MIB [RFCzzzz]. The MIB module defined in this
memo is a sparse augmentation of the entPhysicalTable of the ENTITY-
MIB -- i.e., it is REQUIRED that an agent implementing objects
defined in this memo also implement the relevant ENTITY-MIB objects.
The purpose of the augmentation of the entPhysicalTable is to define
a managed object for the manufacturing date of a managed entity, and
a managed object to support additional information related to the
managed entity.
3.1. entSupplPhysicalManufacturingDate
This object contains the date of manufacturing of the managed entity.
If the manufacturing date is unknown or not supported the object is
not instantiated.
3.2. entSupplPhysicalUris
This object provides additional identification information about the
physical entity. This object may be used to encode for example a URI
containing a Common Language Equipment Identifier (CLEI) URI
[RFCwwww] for the managed physical entity. If no additional
identification information is known or supported about the physical
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 3]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
entity the object is not instantiated.
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 4]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
4. Object Definitions
ENTSUPPL-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
transmission
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
DateAndTime
FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF
entPhysicalIndex
FROM ENTITY-MIB;
entitySupplMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200408160000Z" -- August 16, 2004
ORGANIZATION "IETF Entity MIB Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
"WG charter:
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/entmib-charter.html
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion: [email protected]
To Subscribe: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
Chair: Margaret Wasserman
Postal:
Tel:
E-mail: [email protected]
Author: Kaj Tesink
Postal: One Telcordia Drive
Piscataway, NJ 08854
USA
Tel: +1 732-699-6068
E-mail: [email protected]"
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 5]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
DESCRIPTION
"The objects in this MIB module are used in conjunction
with objects in the ENTITY-MIB to manage entities
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This version
of this MIB module is part of RFC yyyy; see the RFC
itself for full legal notices."
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this notice
REVISION "200408160000Z " -- August 16, 2004
DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published as RFC yyyy."
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this notice
::= { transmission XXX }
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXX with IANA-assigned number & remove this notice
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 6]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
-- The main sections of the module
entitySupplObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entitySupplMIB 1 }
entitySupplConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entitySupplMIB 2 }
-- These objects provide extensions to the entPhysicalTable.
entSupplPhysicalTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntSupplPhysicalEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The table for supplementary objects to the entPhysicalTable."
::= { entitySupplObjects 1 }
entSupplPhysicalEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntSupplPhysicalEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in the entSupplPhysicalTable. For each
instance of this object there MUST be a corresponding
instance of entPhysicalEntry."
INDEX { entPhysicalIndex }
::= { entSupplPhysicalTable 1 }
EntSupplPhysicalEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
entSupplPhysicalManufacturingDate DateAndTime,
entSupplPhysicalUris OCTET STRING
}
entSupplPhysicalManufacturingDate OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DateAndTime
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The manufacturing date for the physical entity."
::= { entSupplPhysicalEntry 1 }
entSupplPhysicalUris OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DisplayString
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 7]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
DESCRIPTION
"This object contains additional identification information
about the physical entity. The object contains URIs and
therefore the syntax of this object must conform to RFC
2396 section 2. Multiple URIs may be separated by white
space characters."
::= { entSupplPhysicalEntry 2 }
--
-- Conformance Statements
--
entitySupplGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entitySupplConformance 1 }
entitySupplCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entitySupplConformance 2 }
-- Object Groups
entitySupplPhysicalGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
entSupplPhysicalManufacturingDate,
entSupplPhysicalUris
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of supplemental objects
for to support physical entity features."
::= { entitySupplGroups 1 }
-- Compliance Statements
entitySupplCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for entities that support
this module. Compliance with the entity3Compliance
statement of the ENTITY-MIB is prerequisite."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
entitySupplPhysicalGroup
}
OBJECT entSupplPhysicalUris
MIN-ACCESS read-only
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 8]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
::= { entitySupplCompliances 1 }
END
5. Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
6. Acknowledgments
The contributions of the Entity MIB Working Group members are
gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks go to Mike Heard, Juergen
Schoenwaelder, Dave Perkins and Dan Romascanu.
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 9]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
7. Security Considerations
entSupplPhysicalInfo defined in this MIB module has a MAX-ACCESS
clause of read-write; erroreous or unauthorized Writing of this
object will result in the provision of misleading information to
network management systems.
The user of this MIB module must therefore be aware that support for
SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection
can have a negative effect on network operations.
The readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., those with MAX-ACCESS
other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive in some
environments since, collectively, they provide information about the
managed entities and can reveal some aspects of their configuration.
In such environments it is important to control even GET and NOTIFY
access to these objects and possibly even to encrypt their values
when sending them over the network via SNMP.
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec),
even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is
allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects
in this MIB module.
It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as
provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8),
including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for
authentication and privacy).
Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator
responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an
instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to
the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate
rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 10]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirements Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management
Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April
1999.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for
SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
[RFCzzzz] Bierman, A., McCloghrie, K., "Entity MIB (Version 3)",
RFCzzzz.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.
[RFCwwww] Tesink, K., Robert H. Fox, "A Uniform Resource Name (URN)
Namespace for the CLEI Code", RFC wwww, August 2004.
9. Author's Address
Kaj Tesink
One Telcordia Drive
Piscataway, NJ 08854
USA
Phone: +1 732 699-6068
EMail: [email protected]
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 11]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 12]
Internet Draft <draft-tesink-entity-supplmib-01.txt> 08/16/2004
************************************************************
* NOTES TO RFC Editor (to be removed prior to publication) *
* *
* 1.) The normative references [RFCwwww] and [RFCzzzz] *
* must be updated to point to the appropriate *
* RFC when the corresponding Internet Draft is published, *
* and all occurrences of the reference tags must be *
* changed. *
* *
* 2.) Please replace all occurrences of "yyyy" in the *
* DESCRIPTION clause of the MODULE-IDENTITY invocation *
* in Section 4 with the RFC number assigned to this *
* specification and remove the accompanying notes. *
* *
* 3.) Please replace "XXX" in the MODULE-IDENTITY value *
* with an IANA-assigned value under the 'transmission' *
* subtree and remove the accompanying note. *
* *
************************************************************
Expires 02/16/2005Entity Manufacturing and URN Objects [Page 13]