Re: Entity MIB v3

Hi Andy,

At 11:34 AM -0800 11/4/04, Andy Bierman wrote:
>I will post an update (w/o the IPR goof) after the IETF.
>I would like to un-deprecate the entLPMappingTable as well.

This makes sense to me.  Does anyone have an objection to this plan?

>Also, I need examples for the entPhysicalUris object.
>This object is too vague for me to provide any examples.
>I also see no guidance for which types of physical
>entities should provide a mfg date.  FRUs only?
>More text is needed for both of these new objects.

Could one of the people who felt strongly that these objects should 
be included in the Entity MIB update please respond to Andy's request 
for more information?

If there is no one who care enough about these objects to do actual 
work to finalize them, perhaps Andy should just leave them out and we 
can get the Entity MIB update published?

Margaret