Re: entPhysicalUris object wrap-up

HI,

I somehow missed the motivating reasons to go from a 
an object that can provide a alternative identification
to an object that supports only CLEI codes.

On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >I propose that this object be changed back to entPhysicalClei.
> >It should contain the empty string (for none) or a URI
> >string conforming to the CLEI URN specification (from Kaj).
> >If we think of other required semantics in the future,
> >we can add new objects then.
> 
> This makes sense to me if we can quickly, easily resolve the reference issues.
> 
> Otherwise, I think we should just remove the object and let others 
> add it as an "augments" if/when the proposed contents are 
> well-defined.
> 
Regards,
/david t. perkins