RE: entstate-653: Don't need to import the textual conve ntions?
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:29:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B40224085E@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> |
hi Ah. Ok. Makes sense. Propose removing its import from the ENTITY-STATE-MIB then. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 3:57 PM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:5K50:EXCH] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Entmib] entstate-653: Don't need to import the textual conventions? On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:30:48AM -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote: > > <Juergen> > "r) There is no need to import TEXTUAL-CONVENTION if the MIB modules > are split into a TC module and one containing object/notification > definitions." </Juergen> > > I don't think I understand this. Are you suggesting that we don't need > to > following: > > EntityAdminState, EntityOperState, EntityUsageState, > EntityAlarmStatus, EntityStandbyStatus > FROM ENTITY-STATE-TC; I was trying to convey that TEXTUAL-CONVENTION is not used in the ENTITY-STATE-MIB module. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany