Re: entstate-651 Notification Description Changes (Part II)

Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:12:29 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <20041217131229.GB3523@james>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 07:31:28AM -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
 
> Well, as I said, I can't think of a design pattern to make then
> conditionally mandatory. Personally, I'd love to see them mandatory, but I
> think we would need strong consensus to make that change at this point.

What were the arguments against making these mandatory? Generally too
hard to detect such state changes? Something else?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany