FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07.txt
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Feb 2005 01:04:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155064983A5@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Feedback from IESG -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Ted Hardie Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 23:28 To: [email protected] Subject: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07.txt Minor, but should be fixed. The document currently says: entPhysicalUris OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object contains additional identification information about the physical entity. The object contains URIs and therefore the syntax of this object must conform to RFC 2396, section 2. Multiple URIs may be present and are separated by white space characters. Leading and trailing white space characters are ignored. If no additional identification information is known or supported about the physical entity the object is not instantiated. A zero length octet string may also be returned in this case." REFERENCE "RFC 2396, Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax, section 2, August 1998." This should be updated to the new URI RFC and a pointer to the appropriate syntax restrictions. This text also does not limit the types of URIs which may be present. If they are limited, an enumerated list should be included. The document also uses "CLEI URI" to refer to a URN in the CLEI namespace. That's technically correct, but it would be easier to understand if CLEI URN was used. Here's an example: The entPhysicalUris object may be used to encode for example a URI containing a Common Language Equipment Identifier (CLEI) URI for the managed physical entity. The URN name space for CLEIs is defined in [RFC CLEIURN], and the CLEI format is defined in [T1.213][T1.213a]. Simply swapping out (CLEI) URI for (CLEI) URN would be fine.