RE: Entity MIB State Extensions

Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Sharon,

Thanks!

Your document should serve as a useful strawman for discussion,
and we can merge the table into the Entity MIB document once we
have rough consensus on what it should look like.

Margaret


At 12:56 PM 10/26/02, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>hi
>
>I've very quickly thrown together an ID called "Entity State MIB"
>based on my recent emails. I've just submitted it and as the
>deadline for -00 drafts is Monday morning, it looked like I've made
>the cut-off. It should give us something a bit more official than
>email to, as I said before, poke sticks at.
>
>I still prefer the idea of adding the state information into the
>actually Entity MIB draft. It is, after all, one little table with
>five objects. The actual page count of the work is longer than
>it needs to be for two reasons:
>         1) I have defined separate textual conventions for the state
>          objects in case someone wanted to re-use them elsewhere.
>         2) I explained things in a lot more detail than is probably
>           necessary and I think ended up repeating myself.
>
>Sharon Chisholm
>Portfolio Integration
>Nortel Networks
>Ottawa, Canada
>_______________________________________________
>Entmib mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.