RE: Entity MIB State Extensions
Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sharon, Thanks! Your document should serve as a useful strawman for discussion, and we can merge the table into the Entity MIB document once we have rough consensus on what it should look like. Margaret At 12:56 PM 10/26/02, Sharon Chisholm wrote: >hi > >I've very quickly thrown together an ID called "Entity State MIB" >based on my recent emails. I've just submitted it and as the >deadline for -00 drafts is Monday morning, it looked like I've made >the cut-off. It should give us something a bit more official than >email to, as I said before, poke sticks at. > >I still prefer the idea of adding the state information into the >actually Entity MIB draft. It is, after all, one little table with >five objects. The actual page count of the work is longer than >it needs to be for two reasons: > 1) I have defined separate textual conventions for the state > objects in case someone wanted to re-use them elsewhere. > 2) I explained things in a lot more detail than is probably > necessary and I think ended up repeating myself. > >Sharon Chisholm >Portfolio Integration >Nortel Networks >Ottawa, Canada >_______________________________________________ >Entmib mailing list >[email protected] >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib