RE: Milestones Update
Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 06:10 PM 12/22/2002 +0200, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: >Are not we too much in a hurry with requiring implementation reports for >the Entity Sensor MIB, only three months after the publication of RFC >3433? According to Section 6.2 of RFC 2026 a Proposed Standard needs to >remain at least six months at Proposed. There is certainly nothing bad in >trying to gather information for advancement earlier, but do we have >reasons to believe that at least two implementations will already be >available that fast? I think that March is a reasonable deadline for putting together an implementation checklist and starting to gather implementation reports, if any. It often takes a couple of months for people to return implementation reports, even when they do have an implementation. If we don't have two implementations by May/June 03, and we have completed all of our other work, we will have to decide what to do with the WG at that time. Margaret