RE: Future Enumservice Registration Process

"Richard Shockey" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <0a0701c81d68$9c8b7a90$d5a26fb0$@us>
Bernie this is a excellent summary of the options.

Chair hat off ... I lean toward Plan B.

The registration proceeds directly to the expert review via a special email
list like we see with URI's. The expert review deals with it in a
"reasonable" time frame and forwards its report to the IESG for ultimate
approval.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Bernie Hoeneisen [mailto:[email protected]]
>  Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 8:42 AM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: [Enum] Future Enumservice Registration Process
>  
>  Hi all
>  
>  *** Please comment until Wednesday, Nov 05 ***
>  
>  One major issue in draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-05.txt seems to
>  be,
>  which process to apply for future Enum service registrations. I went
>  through existing similar IANA processes and found at least four
>  variants,
>  how a registration document can be processed:
>  
>    A) Author -> IESG -> Expert Review -> IESG -> IANA -> Publication
>  
>    B) Author -> Expert Review -> IESG -> IANA -> Publication
>  
>    C) Author -> IANA -> Expert Review -> IANA -> Publication
>  
>    D) Author -> IESG -> IANA -> Expert Review -> IANA -> Publication
>  
>  
>  In the current revision of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-05.txt
>  process B) is documented, however I am tending to replace it by
>  process
>  A), as this way the responsibilities are much more clear.
>  
>  In case registrations should be made without IESG looking at it, C)
>  could be the choice. Maybe for experimental Enumservice registrations
>  this
>  makes sense. If we want to apply such a simple process for normal
>  Enumservice registrations, a major change in RFC 3761 is needed, as
>  RFC 3761 states: "Enumservice registrations needs to be Standards
>  Track,
>  Experimental or BCP"
>  
>  What do you think about? In case there it no major opposition within
>  the
>  next 5 days, I'll rewrite draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-06.txt in
>  favour of process A) and submit it for the Vancouver meeting.
>  
>  cheers,
>    Bernie
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.