RE: Future Enumservice Registration Process
"Richard Shockey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0a0701c81d68$9c8b7a90$d5a26fb0$@us> |
Bernie this is a excellent summary of the options. Chair hat off ... I lean toward Plan B. The registration proceeds directly to the expert review via a special email list like we see with URI's. The expert review deals with it in a "reasonable" time frame and forwards its report to the IESG for ultimate approval. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernie Hoeneisen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 8:42 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Enum] Future Enumservice Registration Process > > Hi all > > *** Please comment until Wednesday, Nov 05 *** > > One major issue in draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-05.txt seems to > be, > which process to apply for future Enum service registrations. I went > through existing similar IANA processes and found at least four > variants, > how a registration document can be processed: > > A) Author -> IESG -> Expert Review -> IESG -> IANA -> Publication > > B) Author -> Expert Review -> IESG -> IANA -> Publication > > C) Author -> IANA -> Expert Review -> IANA -> Publication > > D) Author -> IESG -> IANA -> Expert Review -> IANA -> Publication > > > In the current revision of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-05.txt > process B) is documented, however I am tending to replace it by > process > A), as this way the responsibilities are much more clear. > > In case registrations should be made without IESG looking at it, C) > could be the choice. Maybe for experimental Enumservice registrations > this > makes sense. If we want to apply such a simple process for normal > Enumservice registrations, a major change in RFC 3761 is needed, as > RFC 3761 states: "Enumservice registrations needs to be Standards > Track, > Experimental or BCP" > > What do you think about? In case there it no major opposition within > the > next 5 days, I'll rewrite draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-06.txt in > favour of process A) and submit it for the Vancouver meeting. > > cheers, > Bernie > > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum