Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-cnam (IANA Registration for anEnumservice Calling Name Delivery (CNAM) Information and IANARegistration for URI type 'pstndata' URI type 'pstn') toProposed Standard

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> Hollenbeck, Scott said:
>>> * Why is there a need for a new URI type rather than just 
>>> having a data:
>>> URI with appropriate contents?
>> The data: URI was the original proposal.  The reviewing AD (Jon)
>> mandated a change.  Apparently there is some desire within the IESG to
>> deprecate use of the data: URI.
> 
> Hmm. Can you point me at any documentation for this? [I've been looking at
> the data: URI in other contexts.]

Yes, I would also like info on that. What is the story?

	Thanks,
	Paul