Re: enum services registry question

Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801042031380.27713@machb>
Hi Ed

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Edward Lewis wrote:

> [...]
> The only reference to an RFC here and in others is in the Security 
> Considerations.

Intersting catch. We can take this into consideration for the updated IANA 
Enumservices registration template.

> I'd suggest that registrants make an explicit statement in the functional 
> specification area indicating the RFC (number available when published of 
> course) with the full specification.

There will be additional fun to figure out, how this will work with 
the new regime (as decided in Vancouver), where an RFC will no longer be 
required for registering an Enumservice...

cheers,
  Bernie
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.