Re: enum services registry question
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801042031380.27713@machb> |
Hi Ed On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Edward Lewis wrote: > [...] > The only reference to an RFC here and in others is in the Security > Considerations. Intersting catch. We can take this into consideration for the updated IANA Enumservices registration template. > I'd suggest that registrants make an explicit statement in the functional > specification area indicating the RFC (number available when published of > course) with the full specification. There will be additional fun to figure out, how this will work with the new regime (as decided in Vancouver), where an RFC will no longer be required for registering an Enumservice... cheers, Bernie