Re: enum services registry question

At 20:39 +0100 1/4/08, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:

>There will be additional fun to figure out, how this will work with the new
>regime (as decided in Vancouver), where an RFC will no longer be required
>for registering an Enumservice...

Heh, well, I'd settle for any kind of reference for the enumservices 
*and* the URI schemes!

Consider this a lesson learned from IANA registrations of DNS 
parameters.  We have some RR types 
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters) defined only by a 
human - a name and an email address.  It takes a good bit of googling 
to find any notes stuffed in other, non-IETF, corners of the 
net-universe to find the specifications.  Even having sent fixes to 
IANA hasn't (completely) rectified the problem of missing documents 
and broken references.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Think glocally.  Act confused.