Re: Enumservices categories (COMMON, X-, P-, ...)

Chair hat off .. 

Makes sense to me ! I like it too...

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>  Of lconroy
>  Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 9:29 AM
>  To: Bernie Hoeneisen
>  Cc: [email protected]
>  Subject: Re: [Enum] Enumservices categories (COMMON, X-, P-, ...)
>  
>  Hi Bernie, folks,
>  
>     this will require a small update to the current version of RFC
>  3761bis, but IMHO
>  is a very good plan. If one sees such a "P-xxxx" Enumservice on the
>  Internet, then
>  it SHOULD be ignored. I like this idea.
>  
>  It also codifies the idea that stuff floating around on a private
>  infrastructure
>  does not need to be specified other than between those "consenting
>  networks".
>  
>  This is different from X-xxx, where at least a notification that it
>  is being used
>  (with some optional information on what it does) is preferred - to
>  summarise my
>  understanding of the position at the YVR ENUM WG meeting.
>  
>  all the best,
>     Lawrence
>  
>  On 3 Mar 2008, at 13:41, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > While reading RFC3761bis and writing the IANA registration
>  > procedures, some idea crossed my mind:
>  >
>  > To fulfill all the (known) requiements of Enum users, it make sense
>  to
>  > split Enumservices in different categories. So far I see a need for
>  > three
>  > of them:
>  >
>  > 1. Ordinary (COMMON) registered Enumservices:
>  >     - Normal IANA Registration procedures apply
>  >     - No prefix
>  >
>  > 2. Registered Enumservices for Trial/Experimental:
>  >     - IANA Registration procedures for Trial/Experimental apply
>  >     - Prefix: 'X-'
>  >
>  > 3. Private Enumservices:
>  >     - Not registered anywhere
>  >     - Prefix: 'P-'
>  >
>  > The last category would not need any special standardization
>  > document, as
>  > IMHO a short definition in RFC3761bis about usage of "P-" in private
>  > environment is sufficient.
>  >
>  > Anybody second this proposal?
>  >
>  > Objections?
>  >
>  > cheers,
>  >   Bernie
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > enum mailing list
>  > [email protected]
>  > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum