Re: preliminary notes from the WG meeting in Philidelphia ..

I had the same problem with the CNAM draft ..the word from on high is that
they don't want us to use data: but specific URI's.  We are just doing what
we are told. IMHO its similar to the issues with TXT in RR ..its just become
a junk pile for anyone trying to do anything.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Clive D.W. Feather [mailto:[email protected]]
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:45 AM
>  To: Richard Shockey
>  Cc: [email protected]
>  Subject: Re: [Enum] preliminary notes from the WG meeting in
>  Philidelphia ..
>  
>  Richard Shockey said:
>  > A - Unused draft discussion:
>  [...]
>  > - Lawrence will FOLLOW UP and publish Jon's comments / suggestions
>  on the WG
>  > list.  One was related to the data URI, which Jon has STRONG
>  objections to.
>  > Jon believes there are valid alternatives to the data URI, and he
>  thinks
>  > with those changes it could progress
>  
>  > - Rohan Mahy agrees that the use of data URI is inappropriate,
>  
>  Are these objections to the data URI documented anywhere? As far as I
>  can
>  see, it's the right thing to use for a whole slew of stuff including
>  this.
>  
>  --
>  Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <[email protected]>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495
>  6138
>  Internet Expert     | Home:  <[email protected]>  | Fax:    +44 870 051
>  9937
>  Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973
>  377646
>  THUS plc            |                            |