Re: I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00

Otmar Lendl <[email protected]> Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:06:37 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> Any and all (constructive) feedback gratefully received!
> 

Your definition of the min and max fields are relative to the location 
of the NAPTR record:

    The 'digitsmin' field of the data MUST correspond to the minimum
    number of additional digits to be dialled, relative to the current
    record, which might result in reaching a full ENUM record in the ENUM
    database.

Wouldn't it be easier to use absolute values here?

/ol