Re: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00

Jim,

I'm at NICC at the moment and will see what others have to say before 
replying to the rest of your comments.

Re: this one, though:

> [2] The draft says nothing about how a client should behave when 
> there are many of these proposed send-n (sub) service types and what 
> they would mean. Suppose a lookup returns:

I had already spotted that one and covered it in my working copy.

Ray