Re: I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00
"Clive D.W. Feather" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Richard Shockey said: > Lawrence I generally agree with the thrust of your analysis. I find it very > difficult to support the use of 3761 for digit analysis. 3761 was designed > to query on the full E.164 string not a partial string. We would be going > down a rat hole we do not want to go, especially now. > > ENUM is a pure 1 to 1 mapping from fully formed E.164 FQDN to URI's. The > digit strings must be fully formed in advance before query not during. You've declared that to be the case, but there's no a priori reason why it has to be true. In other words, what is the problem with extending 3761 to allow the interior nodes of the tree to contain useful information? -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <[email protected]> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <[email protected]> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS plc | |