Re: Overlap dialing user experience (Re: I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00)
Jay Daley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF508CADEA.14E54050-ON80257426.0029590E-80257426.002A7BFE@nominet.org.uk> |
Brian > So, there is indeed a pretty substantial problem to do something sensible > for a SIP version of this. The network could complete its processing of the > call as soon as it has sufficient digits to route. The originating end > however needs to know how many more digits there will be in order to > actually send a complete INVITE, and the receiving end can't issue an 200 > until it has all the digits. You appear to have narrowed the case to solely the German/Austrian example where there is a nationally known prefix and the rest of the digits are variable. This draft is not solely about that but primarily for those countries where the prefix length is different for different prefixes (if you see what I mean!). > 2) Have the originating side send an INVITE when it has at least the prefix > number of digits, and then let the receiving end collect DTMF to determine > the rest of the digits using early media. To get the right user experience, > you can't complete the call until all the required digits are entered. Assuming you try to apply this to that stated use case of this draft (as explained above) then this only works where the SIP URI can be determined from insufficient digits. This is highly unlikely to be the case in user ENUM since each provisioned user number will have chosen their own SIP termination. In infrastructure ENUM it might be possible when a carrier has not lost any numbers from its block allocation to number porting, but those cases will be rare. This draft addresses the issue of determining where to send the INVITE to, so trying to solve this by the way the INVITE process works is contradictory. Jay