Re: Overlap dialing user experience (Re: I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00)
Jay Daley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFA4A1D4C5.58D63057-ON80257426.00748FC9-80257426.0075AEBF@nominet.org.uk> |
Brian > I think the mechanism needed by carriers to route calls is a heck of a lot > easier to solve then a mechanism needed by a phone to dial a hotel that > decided on its own how long it's numbers are. > > If you want to generalize to "needed by originators" instead of carriers, it > doesn't change the problem. > > The number of digits needed to route to the termination domain is determined > by a block assignment by a number administrator. There is one per country > of them. Creating a system where we define a way for them to communicate > block assignments seems to be a pretty tractable problem. There is an assumption there that the number structure created by the national number administrator is the same as the structure within the ENUM tree. This is only true in the pathological case of a fully populated tree. In User ENUM that simply will not be the case. What this draft does is allow the manager of a part of an ENUM tree to describe the structure of that part of the tree and thereby make the dialling process more efficient. In the case of User ENUM this could be the T1 registry. As numbers are registered with them they would create and/or modify send-n records higher up the tree from where the numbers are provisioned. These send-n records would therefore be quite dynamic, responding to the local growth in user ENUM. Jay