Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-yu-enumservice-sms-smpp-01.txt
"Alexander Mayrhofer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Is there any thoughts on what the WG should do with this document? > > Make a WG item now? > > Discuss it in Dublin? > > Wait for the Registration Draft to be finalized? My personal opinion is that we should ask to make it an WG item right now, and discuss it in Dublin (_but_ prepare the discussion until then). The Enumservice itself looks pretty uncontroversial to me - otoh, i don't know how easy it will be to acquire the URI scheme ... we've been there already with other Enumservices :) _If_ the document is overtaken by the Enumservice registration doc (which i doubt), we could still process it according to the "new rules" anyway. My feeling is that from the ENUM perspective we should get this beyond the WG pretty quick (probably LC after Dublin?) - however, to do this we need reviewers especially for the URI scheme part (best would be both URI scheme _and_ SMPP experts). Any volunteers for the URI scheme review? thoughts? Alex