Re: Review of draft-yu-enumservice-sms-smpp WG ITEM?

Hi Rich et al.

**  This concerns all autors of existing and upcoming
**  Enumservice registrations

As author of the Enumservice Registration I-D, I can state that this I-D 
is certainly mature enough to be used as a guideline and test case for any 
upcoming Enumservice registration.

The remaining open issues mainly concern administrative and procedural 
stuff such as down-refs, escrow copy at IANA, X- vs. P-.

These issues are definitely not in the way of using the Enumservice 
Registration I-D as a guideline for upcoming ENUMservice registrations. 
The technical content is close to final and has been stable for quite a 
while.


Thus, authors of Enumservice registrations, from now on please use

   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide

for writing up and updating your proposals.

Using the stucture described in this I-D will make the reviewer's life 
much easier and, as a result, you may get your document through faster.


cheers,
  Bernie


On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Richard Shockey wrote:

>>  without any disrespect to the document under consideration:
>>  Now that we have the "enum services" document in its final stages,
>>  wouldn't
>>  it be better to use _this_ draft as one test case for "enum services"
>>  and thus,
>>  with AD backing of course, not adopt it but use the procedure outlined
>>  in  "enum services" for review and evaluation?
>
> That would be nice but how close are we to being ready to go to WGLC on the
> Registration document?
>
> Would the Registration draft authors care to comment?